6. Statement: Should the
prestigious people who have committed crime unknowingly, be met with
special treatment?
Arguments:
I. Yes. The
prestigious people do not commit crime intentionally.
II.
No.
It is our policy that everybody is equal before the law
7. Statement: Should all the unauthorized
structures in the city be demolished?
Arguments:
I. No.
Where will the people residing in such houses live?
II. Yes.
This will give a clear message to general public and they will refrain
from constructing unauthorized buildings.
8.Statement: Is buying things on
instalments profitable to the customer?
Arguments:
I. Yes. He has to pay
less.
II. No, paying
instalments upsets the family budget.
9. Statement: Should government
jobs in rural areas have more incentives?
Arguments:
I. Yes. Incentives are
essential for attracting government servants there.
II. No. Rural areas are
already cheaper, healthier and less complex than big cities. So ? Why
offer extra incentives.
10. Statement: Should 'computer
knowledge' be made a compulsory subject for all the students at
secondary school level?
Arguments:
I. No, our need is
'bread' for everyone, we cannot follow western models.
II. Yes. We cannot
compete in the international market without equipping our children with
computers
11. Statement: Should India engage
into a dialogue with neighbouring countries to stop cross border
tension?
Arguments:
I. Yes. This is the
only way to reduce the cross border terrorism and stop loss of innocent
lives.
II. No. Neighboring
countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage
in subversive activities.
12. Statement: Should the practice
of transfers of clerical cadre employees from government offices of one
city to those of another be stopped?
Arguments:
I. No. Transfer of
employees is a routine administrative matter and we must continue it.
II. Yes. It involves
lot of governmental expenditure and inconvenience too many compared to the benefits it yields.
13. Statement: Is paying ransom or
agreeing to the conditions of kidnappers of political figures, a proper
course of action?
Arguments:
I. Yes. The victims
must be saved at all cost.
II. No. It encourages
the kidnappers to continue their sinister activities.
14. Statement: Should there be no
place of interview in selection?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it is very
subjective in assessment.
II. No. It is the only
instrument to judge candidates' motives and personality.
15. Statement: Should family
planning be made compulsory in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes. Looking to the
miserable conditions in India, there is no other go.
II. No. In India there
are people of various religions and family planning is against the
tenets of some of the religions.
16. Statement: Should there be a
ceiling on the salary of top executives of multinationals in our
country?
Arguments:
I. Yes. Otherwise it
would lead to unhealthy competition and our own industry would not be
able to withstand that.
II. No. With the accent
on liberalization of economy, any such move would be
counter-productive. Once the economy picks up, this disparity will be
reduced
17. Statement: Should import duty on
all the electronic goods be dispensed with?
Arguments:
I. No. This will
considerably reduce the income of the government and will adversely
affect the developmental activities.
II. No. The local
manufacturers will not be able to compete with the foreign
manufacturers who are technologically far superior.
18. Statement: Should children be
legally made responsible to take care of their parents during their old
age?
Arguments:
I. Yes. Such matter
can only be solved by legal means.
II. Yes. Only this will
bring some relief to poor parents.
19. Statement: Should there be
reservation in Government jobs for candidates from single child family?
Arguments:
I. No. This is not
advisable as the jobs should be offered to only deserving candidates
without any reservation for a particular group.
II. Yes. This will help
reduce the growing population in India as the parents will be
encouraged to adopt single child norm.
20. Statement: Should we scrap the
'Public Distribution System' in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, Protectionism
is over, everyone must get the bread on his/her own.
II. Yes. The poor do
not get any benefit because of corruption
ANSWERS
1.A, 2.E, 3.B, 4.B, 5.B,
6.B, 7.B, 8.D, 9.A, 10.B, 11.A, 12.D, 13.E, 14.A, 15.E, 16.E, 17.B, 18.D,
19.D, 20.D,
|